J&K Public Service Commission member alleges violation of norms in
selection of officers
“Result notification issued on November 16 without mandatory approval”
___________
SRINAGAR, Jan 3: Days before his retirement on Thursday,
one of the four members of the Jammu & Kashmir Public Service Commission
[PSC] complained to Governor Narendar Nath Vohra that rules and regulations
were being flouted with impunity in the selection of gazetted officers for
different civil and judicial services in the State.
A communication received by the Raj Bhavan from the
outgoing PSC member Javed Makhdoomi last week alleged that Chairman S.L. Bhat
“completely sidelined and reduced to a rubber stamp” three of the four members
of the multi-member constitutional body with the help of one member and
Secretary of the commission. Mr. Makhdoomi cited the selection of junior
judges, while dropping a veritable bombshell that the result notification
issued on November 16 had not been signed or approved in any other manner by
three of the four members.
The communication accessed by The Hindu carries
along a bundle of documents to establish that the three members — Javed
Makhdoomi, Kulbhushan Jandial and Masood Samoon, had made repeated submissions
to the Chairman, urging him to stem the rot of “selective leakage” and make the
selection processes fair and transparent. However, Mr. Bhat not only persisted
with the scheme of things with impunity but also got the result of the Kashmir
Civil Service Judicial Examination notified without the Commission’s mandatory
approval.
“Yes, I have sent a representation to the Governor and
sought his intervention to set things right at the PSC,” Mr. Makhdoomi
confirmed. “If three of the four members of the Commission have recorded their
reservations, expressed serious apprehensions with regard to the fairness of
the selection process and refused to sign it, somebody needs to probe,” Mr.
Makhdoomi told The Hindu. The Governor, he said, was the “last resort”
as the Chairman, according to him, had not responded to the representations of
the three members. He asserted that the result notification of KCS (Judicial)
examination was “completely illegal and unauthorised,” confirming that he, on
behalf of the three dissident members, requested the Governor to order an
investigation.
Raj Bhavan sources said that a letter from Mr. Makhdoomi
had been received and it was being passed on to the Governor.
“The result notification needs to be cancelled forthwith
as it doesn’t have approval of three-fourth of the members,” Mr. Makhdoomi
said. Quoting from PSC’s rules of business and procedure, he contended that all
decisions, including selection lists and result notifications, were required to
be approved by the quorum — 50 per cent of the members plus one. He claimed
that only one of the four members— Khizar Mohammad Wani, was taken on board in
issuing the result notification of the Munsiffs’ written examination.
Vacancies
As against the sanctioned strength of eight members and a
chairman, the PSC has been operating with just four members and the chairman
since 2011. With Mr. Makhdoomi’s retirement now, its size has further reduced
to three — the first time in the last several years.
Interestingly, none of the government departments has
referred any vacancies to the Commission in recent times, though they are all
bound by SRO-166 dated 14-06-2005 to refer all vacancies “by the 15th of
January every year.”
The PSC is currently scheduling the interview of the 202
candidates declared as passed in the screening test. However, in the last seven
weeks the Chief Justice of the J&K High Court has not deputed any of the
judges to assist the PSC panel in holding the viva voce. Informed sources
insist that inclusion of names of the children of some influential men in the
executive and the judiciary has raised many eyebrows in certain institutions
and the civil society.
The communication received by the Raj Bhavan carries
documentary evidence to prove that the members had repeatedly urged the
Chairman to plug the “selective leakage,” which, according to the three
dissident members was being managed by men in the Civil Secretariat through
some computer operators and ‘consultants’ engaged on contract. It has been
pointed out that even a retired official, who has worked with the Chairman’s
loyalist member at the non-gazetted recruitment board previously, has also been
engaged by the PSC.
The Commission's chairman, S.L. Bhat, and Secretary, T.S.
Ashok Kumar, did not respond to phone calls. The Hindu also e-mailed a
questionnaire to Mr. Kumar, but did not receive a response in the last 10 days.