Geelani denies ‘macadam statement’, sticks to his guns on Amarnath
Ahmed Ali Fayyaz
According
to a statement issued today from headquarters of Geelani-led faction of the
Hurriyat Conference, neither the conglomerate nor its head had ever claimed
that the track to the holy Cave was being widened and macadamized. Spokesperson
of the separatist alliance claimed that the state government’s sponsored aerial
inspection of the track by a select group of journalists on Wednesday was “just
an attempt to distract attention from the real issue”. He added: “Hurriyat (G)
has never alleged black-topping of the yatra
track. It has never claimed that structures were being raised over there”, the
spokesman asserted.
“After a
detailed survey in upstream Pahalgam, Hurriyat (G) had said that building
material was being dumped on the track at large scale by the Shrine Board. It
had simply expressed apprehensions that attempts could be made in future to
utilize these dumps for widening and macadamizing the road in a phased manner”,
the spokesman said. He asserted that Hurriyat (G) was continuously firm and resolute
on its four demands made in 2008---immediate dissolution of Shrine Board,
shifting the entire gamut of the pilgrimage and shrine management to the local
Pandits, reducing the number of pilgrims and curtailment to the yatra period.
The
spokesman said that macadam or no macadam could be considered only after the
Government responded to Hurriyat’s charter of demands. It needed to be
clarified whether the government taken Hurriyat’s demands seriously or it was
taking Delhi ’s
diktats with its eyes shut, said the spokesman. He alleged that the
establishment was misleading the masses through the unwarranted refrain of
“no-macadam” which was not Hurriyat’s fundamental demand. He claimed that the
Hurriyat’s concerns and demands were based on apprehensions of scientists and
ecological experts who believed that existing duration and rush of the
pilgrims, coupled with constructions, could have a dangerously negative impact
on the Valley’s environment. Even the sources of water could dry up completely,
he said.
In a
press conference on October 18th, Geelani had threatened to launch a
mass agitation after Eid-ul-Azha (October 27th) if the state
government did not stop widening and macadamizing the pilgrimage track from
Pahalgam to the holy cave. From Chief Minister to IGP Kashmir, several government
functionaries have contradicted Geelani’s statement and claimed that there were
no such plans on cards. On October 31st, Government sponsored an
aerial survey of select mediapersons by a helicopter and provided evidence that
no construction work was underway. However, the trip was restricted to only
Baltal area and no sorties manoeuvered to Pahalgam-Cave track.
In his
October 18th press conference, Geelani had warned that the fresh
anti-Shrine Board agitation would be “far bigger than that of 2008 and 2010”.
At the same news conference, Geelani had claimed that fresh efforts of raising
“Amarnath Nagar” were underway. According to him, Governor was implementing the
plan by directly taking dictation from New
Delhi and the state government had been rendered
completely helpless. He had claimed that huge quantities of construction
material had been already dumped on Pahalgam upstream as the Shrine Board,
according to him, had started widening and macadamizing the road to the Cave.
“Shrine
Board has arranged special permission for vehicles as truckloads of material
are reaching from Rajasthan with the direction to authorities that none of
these vehicles be subjected to checking”, Geelani had told mediapersons.
According to him, the road from Pahalgam to the holy Cave was being widened and
macadamized under orders of Supreme Court and Omar Abdullah’s government had
not deployed any of its attorneys in defence. Geelani had claimed that Hurriyat
was not against the pilgrimage but it was putting up resistance “only because
this pilgrimage is being used as a tool to sustain and strengthen the Indian
political aggression (on Jammu and
Kashmir )”. He had also mentioned conservation of
ecology and wildlife as another reason.
END
No comments:
Post a Comment